Job offer: PhD position in the field "Charge transport through nanostructures using multiprobe STM techniques"
Charge transport through Nanostructures
A current challenge in nanoscience is to measure the charge transport through
nanostructures grown by self-assembly. The controlled fabrication of such self-organized
nanostructures with dimensions in the single-digit nanometer range has become possible.
For instance semiconductor nanowires and nanorings with a width down to a few atoms have
been fabricated in a controlled way. Quantum effects are expected in the charge transport
through self-organized nanostructures. Besides the fabrication aspects, the ability to
provide contacts to the nanostructures in order to characterize them is a major challenge,
since, in contrast to nanostructures grown by lithographic methods, the location of the
self-organized structures is not predefined. The scanning tunneling microscope (STM) is
an appropriate tool for imaging these nanostructures down to the atomic range and characterizing
them by spectroscopic methods. However, only one probe alone is not sufficient to measure the
charge transport properties of laterally grown nanostructures.
An additional probe is needed to provide the second contact.
Combination of STM and SEM
Scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) is an ideal method for imaging surfaces on an atomic scale.
But if the samples are structured on a larger scale, as for example integrated circuits,
the analysis is limited by the STM's scan range of typically less than 20 μm. It is in this
case difficult to locate characteristic features of the sample with the STM. We have therefore
combined a beetle-type STM with a scanning electron microscope (SEM).
With the SEM it is possible to measure overview scans at various magnifications and to
image relatively large areas of the sample (up to about 2 x 2 mm²).
The SEM images are then used to select certain parts of the sample for the STM-analysis.
All this is done under ultrahigh vacuum conditions. The electron gun and the secondary
electron detector (SED) of the SEM are arranged perpendicular to each other so that the STM-tip
causes a shading of secondary electrons coming from the part of the sample which is opposite to
the SED. This tip shadow is important for the positioning of the tip relative to the sample.
Thus the SEM is very helpful for the tip approach to the sample and for the selection of the
sample area to be analyzed with STM. Beyond that it is possible to investigate the quality of
the tip and the sample preparation with the SEM.
More details can be found here:
Rev. Sci. Instrum. 72, 3546 (2001).
Double-tip STM design
In order to allow a fast and well-defined approach of the STM tips, an ad-on scanning electron
microscope (SEM) is used which allows imaging over a broader range of resolution and allows
to monitor the STM tips during approach.
To make the STM as small and rigid as possible, our construction is based on the Besocke
beetle-type STM invented in Jülich. This type of STM shows unique properties in rigidity,
thermal drift compensation and simplicity of use. Especially the possibility of integrating
the main components (coarse approach, coarse movement, sample holder and scanner) in a
small space makes this concept promising for a multi-tip STM.

The electron focusing column is aligned coaxially to the double-tip STM.
In order to prevent the coupling between vertical and lateral
movement in the original beetle scheme (using a helical
ramp ring), we introduced a second ring which is exclusively
devoted to transversal movement (see figure). Since
this flat ring is planar any motion of the flat ring will not
affect the tip-sample distance. The scanning tube piezo, which provides
the fine movement of the STM tip, is mounted to the upper
ramp ring, so that it performs both motions: the lateral motion
of the flat ring and the vertical motion of the ramp ring.
Performance of the Double-tip STM
In order to obtain well-resolved
SEM images the STM must not be decoupled from
the chamber (during SEM operation) since a rigid connection between the SEM column
and the STM is needed.
Following figure shows an SEM image of the two STM tips brought close together (2 μm) on a Si surface.
On the right side of the figure a higher magnification SEM image is shown with Si step bunches visible as
dark horizontal lines. The minimum practical separation of both STM tips in tunnel contact
is limited by the radius of curvature of the tip apex. If the tips come too close they touch
each other. With chemically etched tungsten tips a radius of curvature of about 10-50 nm can
be obtained. This would lead to a minimum tip-tip distance of 20-100 nm.

(a) Lower magnification scan showing the electro-chemically etched tungsten tips.
(b) Closer view of the tips with higher magnification. The distance between the two tips is about 2 μm.
The same area of a sample can be accessed and scanned with each tip.
The next figure shows two STM images of the overlapping area on a Si(111) surface obtained with both tips.
The area was first scanned with the inner scanner and after parking the tip at a save distance,
the outer scanner was used to image the same region.
To demonstrate that it is the very same area, four identical objects in the images are highlighted by ovals.
The difference in the step orientation of the two images originates in the different orientation of the inner and outer scanner.
This result shows that the double-tip STM is able to image the same objects of nanometer size with both STM tips.
This ability will be essential for contacting and electrically characterizing nanostructures.
To image and study nanostructures consisting of only a few atoms, which are most promising for quantum electronics,
atomic resolution is indispensable for the instrument. Therefore atomic resolution is the most desirable,
but also the most delicate feature of a multi-tip STM.
If single atoms can be resolved, the position of the tip with respect to the surface is very stable.
This is particularly important for spectroscopic measurement with the STM.

Specific objects like scratches and small terraces are marked by circles.
The scan range of both images is about 1 μm.
To demonstrate the ability of the beetle-type double-tip STM to resolve single atoms,
the prominent (7x7) reconstruction of the Si(111) surface was chosen.
The following figure shows a constant-current-mode scan with positive sample voltage.
The adatoms of the (7x7) unit cell can be clearly recognized.

The image shows the silicon (111)-7x7 surface reconstruction.
APPLICATIONS
Measuring the I/V characteristics of Au nanocontacts on low temperature GaAs
The I/V characteristic of Au nanocontacts on low temperature GaAs has been measured with our STM/ SEM combination.
The measurements were performed directly on the nanocontacts with the help of the STM tip.
The SEM was used to guide the STM tip toward the nanocontacts.
I-V characteristics for two nanocontacts with lateral dimensions of 100 nm and 200 nm, respectively, are shown.
The tip was pushed into the contact until a saturation of the I/V curve was observed.

Measuring the I/V characteristics of GaAs resonant tunnelling diodes
Resonant tunnelling diodes are contacted using one STM tip and I/V characteristics with the peak
structure usual for resonant tunnelling diodes are measured on diodes down to 40 nm size.
When a gate voltage was applied using the second STM tip small shifts in the peak structure
of the resonant tunnelling diodes are observed.

SUMMARY
We have presented a new concept of a multiprobe
STM. By using the reliable beetle-type design two
STM stages were arranged coaxially. Furthermore, the
original Besocke design was extended by an additional flat
ring to provide the probes with full freedom of movement.
An add-on SEM provides safe navigation of the two STM
tips down to the nm scale. The instrument shows all the features
which make it a promising tool for measuring charge
transport through nanostructures. It is straightforward to
extend the concept of the described beetle-type double-tip
STM towards a four-tip STM with the ability to perform
four-point probe measurements on the nanoscale.
REFERENCES
P. Jaschinsky, P. Coenen, G. Pirug, and B. Voigtländer,
Rev. Sci. Instr. 77, 093701 (2006).
J. Wensorra, M. I. Lepsa, K. M. Indlekofer, A. Förster, P. Jaschinsky, B. Voigtländer, G. Pirug, and H. Lüth, phys. stat. sol. (a) 203, 3559 (2006).
Philipp Jaschinsky, Jakob Wensorra, Mihail Ion Lepsa, Josef Mysliveček, and Bert Voigtländer J. Appl. Phys. 104 094307 (2008).
last change 01.04.2009 | Nicolas Kau | Print

